Check with seller Recall revision review challenge appeal (Ph: 9873540498) NRI Quash 498a usa uk New Delhi

Published date: July 9, 2017
  • Location: New Delhi, Delhi, India

Recall revision review challenge appeal (Ph: 9873540498) NRI Quash 498a usa uk

NRI non resident indian husbands NRI sister cant be called from USA to attend Indian courts vide DV Act, 2005. Recall of the summons is better than the challenging of summons in the sessions. For this one need not even require application for condonation of delay as the matter is illegal. Recall of an illegal order is mandatory under the law and every judge or JFMC/ MM etc have the powers to recall their own powers. A family court judge and a sessions court judge has wider powers in respect thereof. Whereas a lower court smallest possible judge i.e., matrimonial magistrate can also be made to read the ruls wherein he also has the powers to recall his illegal & erred orders. Under domestic violence act the women cant be respondents unless the charges are grave & specific. This grave and specific both conditions need to be satisfied before calling a women respondent i.e., before issuing summons to a woman respondent. Even husband can directly ask the MM to issue order in respect thereof without even getting power of attorney from the woman respondent because this is the mistake of the law to call women as a respondent under PWDVA 2005 which is basically said to be woman versus men and not women versus women.

If any help needed then please contact:-

man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com

moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
web:- http://nriquash.com

A SISTER EVEN IF UNMARRIED BUT LIVING FAR AWAY CAN NOT BE LEGALLY MADE A RESPONDENT UNDER THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT 2005

Such a wrong or illegal order can be RECALLED. The contents of the recall application are given below. Do NOT change the contents because these are the extracts taken from many judgments.

That the above noted complaint is pending disposal before this Hon’ble Court & the same is fixed for 30th April’2017.

That vide order dated dd/mm/2016 (write date of summons) which I came to know few days back in December 2016 itself your esteemed Hon’ble Court has issued the summons to respondent no. 4 being a woman and an unmarried sister living in America.

That as per 2(e) of DV Act Women can’t be respondent under the Domestic Violence Act unless the charges are grave & specific.

That there are only two specific i.e., dated allegations against the respondent no.4 which are not just false but were known to the complainant herself to be false allegation as the documents annexed show that the allegation have been made intentionally by the complainant as follows.

That allegation dated 27-3-2015 says that respondent no.4 left for America stating that she will spoil matrimonial life of complainant and will not let her join her husband in America but on this date 27-3-2015 the respondent no. 4 was in Rajasthan and complainant was in Ludhiana as it was a working day for her at Ludhiana (Gemini documents annexed for your kind perusal showing that she attended the office on 27-3-2015) hence the complainant deliberately engineered this false allegation which was very well within the knowledge of the complainant to be an untrue allegation.

That allegation dated 28-7-2015 says that respondent no. 4 humiliated complainant and her relatives saying that marriage alliance is not of the standard of their son but the respondent no. 4 is unmarried and does not have any son.

That the allegations by complainant against the respondent no.4 are not grave and are also void for vagueness.

That the definition of respondents prohibits manifestly the launching of proceedings under the protection of the Act, 2005. As a matter of law as envisaged under the Act it is the women who is the aggrieved person qua the adult male person as defined in S.2)q) of the Act, The impleading of women member as the respondent in the petition shows the very mala-fide intention of the petitioner. Hence the petition along with merit dismissal against the women respondents as being not maintainable.

I humbly pray to this Hon’ble Court to recall your order dated dd/mm/2016 (write date of summons) which I came to know few days back in December 2016 itself & to pass such other orders or order that this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the interests of justice.

Hence, RECALLING OF ORDER OR RECALLING OF SUMMONS IS BETTER OPTION THAN CHALLENGING SUMMONS.

Best Wishes & Happy Fighting false cases & SOCIAL STIGMA on you & family!!!.

If any help needed then please contact:-

man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com

moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
web:- http://www.nri498ahelpline.com


Mobile No: 9873540498
Share by email Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on LinkedIn Pin on Pinterest

Contact seller Share

Related listings

Comments

    Leave your comment (spam and offensive messages will be removed)